![]() |
| ||
| Volume 1- Issue 30 - October, 2008 | |||
|
What Are Your Employees Worth?Retention has been a focus of this newsletter recently, and with good reason—because the only thing more important than recruiting and hiring the best talent in the market is keeping that talent on board and not letting it get away. There are many components of an effective retention program, with
compensation being one of the most important. Many
companies believe they set their compensation structures, while in fact
the marketplace sets compensation standards and your top performers stay
on top of those. This is why it’s crucial for you to stay on top of
current compensation in your field, as well.
Now, if you’re doing everything else necessary to retain these
superstars and your compensation is on par, then there’s an excellent
chance they’ll stay right where they are. But if your compensation
is below what they could be earning elsewhere, they might start to
speculate about whether the grass is really greener on the other side
(even if it isn’t).
If it’s substantially below . . . well, we don’t even want to think
about that scenario.
Crunching the (compensation)
numbers
First, the good news that I’m sure most of you already know—the Manufacturing industry in the United States is not dead. In fact, current economic conditions, namely the weak dollar, have actually contributed to the industry in a positive fashion. How’s that for irony? Not only that, due to continued globalization and the emergence of developing markets overseas, the cost of off-shoring is more expensive than it’s been in recent years. American exports are becoming a hot commodity these days. That’s not to suggest that the industry isn’t facing its own unique
set of challenges and obstacles. Of course it is, and that’s why
companies within Manufacturing need to continue recruiting, retaining, and
compensating the best and the brightest. According to IndustryWeek’s
2008 Salary Survey, although compensation levels overall are relatively
the same this year as they were last year, managers in some areas of
Manufacturing benefited from a noticeable increase.
At the top of that list are those in the Pharmaceuticals/Healthcare
sector, with an average salary of $137,010. The rest of the top five
include Consulting/Education ($132,235), Apparel/Textiles ($130,954),
Chemicals ($122,023) and Construction/Building Equipment ($114,998).
And as far as which parts of the country experienced the biggest increase
in compensation, those would be the South Atlantic states ($96,842 to
$113,128) and the Pacific states ($114,987 to $116,035).
In the survey, there were four major factors affecting the level of
compensation (outside of sector and geographical region). They were
education, experience, job responsibility, and seniority. Below are
the top levels of each factor, along with the average salary associated
with that specific level:
Doctorate degree—$147,121
26+ years of experience—$115,523 Corporate/executive management—$156,123 26+ years of seniority—$114,720 Here’s perhaps the most interesting information unearthed by the
IndustryWeek survey: there are not many younger people in the
Manufacturing workforce. Only 3% of survey respondents are in their
twenties, only 18% are under the age of 40, and just 7% have been in the
industry for less than five years. These numbers are a valid cause
for concern. They mean that many companies may be facing an imminent
shortage of talent.
The IndustryWeek survey was taken by nearly 1,350 Manufacturing
professionals across the country. The average age of those
professionals is between 50 and 59 years (nearly half the respondents were
50 or older). In addition, the average amount of experience that
those professionals possess is 26 years. That means in just a few
years, many of these people will be leaving the workforce . . . and
they’ll be taking a lot of knowledge and experience with them.
That’s why it’s absolutely crucial that your company has a strategic
succession program in place, one that will account for these challenging
demographics and ensure that productivity doesn’t suffer as a result of
what appears to be a considerable generation gap.
In addition, that succession program should be part of a larger
workforce plan. In order to compete in today’s market, it’s more
imperative than ever to manage your human assets as skillfully and
judiciously as possible. Compensate your superstar employees based
upon the criteria you deem to be most important, recruit the best talent
available, and then ensure that valuable knowledge is being dispersed
through a structured mentoring program.
An investment, not a cost
With the end of 2008 on the horizon, this is a good time to evaluate the compensation of your employees. Use the information provided above to ensure that this compensation is in line with industry standards, and if it’s merited, make sure that it exceeds those standards. The cost of losing one of your top employees far outweighs the cost
of providing that employee with more compensation. In fact, it’s not
even a cost, it’s an investment. That employee,
through their skills, talent, and experience, will continue contributing
in a positive fashion to the company’s bottom line. In all
likelihood, the return on your investment will increase in accordance with
the employee’s increase in compensation.
So . . . what are your employees worth? Are
you expressing that worth through the compensation you’re providing?
Your answers to those questions will ultimately have a profound impact on
the success of your company through the rest of this year and into
2009.
If you would like a review of your current compensation structure on
a consultative basis, contact us for more information.
(As always, we value your input regarding the content for our newsletter. If you have any ideas or suggestions for future topics, be sure to contact us at hedhntrs@staffing.net . We look forward to hearing from you.) © Copyright 2008 | |||
|
If you would like to be removed from this mailing list please click
here. Midwest Headhunters adheres to SPAM rules and will honor your decision to be removed. | |||